

In today’s financial landscape, I’ve seen firsthand how loan applications can make or break both individual and business growth. Whether it’s a young professional applying for their first mortgage or a small business securing working capital, banks are under immense pressure to process applications quickly, accurately, and securely. Yet, during my testing and research, one obstacle kept surfacing again and again: scattered documents.
That's when it hit me: combining documents into one, organized PDF isn't an amenity - it's the future of banking. By adding all ancillary documents into one file, banks can simplify internal approvals, minimize processing mistakes, and provide quicker approvals.
To put this hypothesis to the test, I tested a number of different PDF merging solutions against real-world loan document case scenarios - some scanned, some digital, some mixed. The variations between programs were dramatic, and one emerged as both genuinely free and reasonable for heavy-volume banking applications.
One of the most document-heavy bank functions is loan processing. A single borrower's file may readily contain:
When such files come in as standalone attachments in incompatible formats - some as scans, others as Word or Excel documents - loan officers have to waste precious time downloading, opening, and referencing one against the other. The likelihood of lost attachments, incorrect formats, or multiple versions is greatly increased, further reducing the approval cycle.
By putting all of it into one neat, well-structured PDF, banks establish a "single source of truth" for every applicant. Not only are hours of administrative effort saved, but also clarity is provided, mistakes are minimized, and handovers are facilitated quickly between departments. Where turnaround time is the very determinant of customer satisfaction, streamlined documentation is a competitive edge.
In loan applications, banks have really no tolerance for any inefficiency or breach of security. Not all PDF software keeps in mind finance workflows; hence, it pays to spot and prioritize features that count in terms of speed, accuracy, and compliance.
By comparing tools to these standards, banks are able to distinguish between flashy but constrained options and those that actually optimize their day-to-day activities.
In order to determine which PDF merger tool works best for banks, we set up a real-world test intended to simulate the same issues that arise during loan processing. Rather than working with a few small files, we constructed an example loan application package that is representative of what officers often work with:
We then tested each tool for speed of processing, document arranging ease, adaptability with various file types, and safety features (such as encryption, automatic deletion, and data protection). We also considered any limitations, such as task limits, page restrictions, or paywalls, as these have a direct influence on how many applications a bank can process in a single day.
This method guaranteed an equal, realistic comparison - one that mirrors the real-world pressure of juggling dozens of documents per candidate while being speedy, accurate, and compliant.
Rank |
Tool |
Ease of Use |
Rate |
Speed |
Free Plan |
Price (Paid) |
Best For |
1 |
iLovePDF2 |
5/5 |
5/5 |
5/5 |
Unlimited |
Free Forever |
Large files, professionals, students |
2 |
Adobe Acrobat |
4.5/5 |
5/5 |
4.5/5 |
Limited trial |
$12.99 / month |
Enterprise-grade precision |
3 |
Sejda PDF |
4/5 |
4/5 |
4/5 |
50 pages / 3 tasks/hr |
$7.50 / month |
Light, quick tasks |
4 |
PDFCandy |
3.5/5 |
4/5 |
3.5/5 |
2 tasks per hour |
$6 / month or $48/yr |
Users needing flexible but budget tools |
5 |
Smallpdf |
3.5/5 |
4/5 |
3.5/5 |
2 tasks/day |
$9 / month or $108/yr |
General productivity & OCR capabilities |
Among all tested tools, i Love PDF 2 proved itself the most bank-friendly option - achieving an ideal balance among accessibility, speed, and security. For institutions that process hundreds of loan applications per day, that's a recipe for much smoother workflows and speedier approvals. Unlike many competitors, it offers:
For large-volume financial settings where speed and precision are not negotiable, ILovePDF2 is a reliable, affordable choice.
Adobe Acrobat: With its enterprise-level accuracy and professional-level editing suite, Adobe is still a formidable choice. But for banks that need to simply merge loan application documents, its $12.99/month cost is too high. Most institutions end up paying for functionality they don't need to use very often and are therefore less cost-effective than smaller, free options.
Sejda PDF: Sejda features a minimalistic interface and cheap paid plans, but its free plan is limited to 50 pages or three tasks per hour. For banks with dozens of applicants coming in every day, this limitation soon becomes impractical, prompting upgrades or slowing down employees.
PDFCandy: This is a powerful tool with broad support for file formats other than PDF. However, the two-task-per-hour free cap causes a major slowdown in banking processes. Although its paid plan is less expensive than Adobe's, freemium users find it difficult to cope with the document-intensive nature of loan processing.
SmallPDF: Known for its OCR (optical character recognition) feature, which proves handy when handling documents scanned from paper. Still, with the two-task-per-day free quota, it is not feasible for loan departments working on multiple files. Unless it is upgraded, the banks experience interruptions in what ideally should be a seamless review process.
For those institutions that value speed, security, and cost-effectiveness, these limitations point towards why I Love PDF 2's unlimited, free service and robust privacy protections are the more functional option for handling loan applications.
Most PDF tools advertise themselves as "free," but in practice, the restrictions render them unsuitable for use. Hidden limits, watermarks, or daily task allowances can immediately interrupt workflows - particularly in sectors such as banking, where volume and speed are paramount.
Whereas I Love PDF 2 is refreshingly new. It's "free forever" approach eliminates these covert limits - no page limits, no task limits, no upgrades forced upon you. All functionalities - combining, compressing, converting, et cetera - are available to all users without exception. This means reliability for banks that manage dozens of daily loan applications, efficiency in workflows without interrupting productivity, and saving costs with no trade-offs at all.
With time being money in an industry, banks are no longer able to spare time spent on redundant document collection due to split submissions. Combining files into one PDF makes loan applications quicker to examine, simpler to process, and safer.
By testing it hands-on, I Love PDF 2 emerged as the strongest contender: unlimited, secure, free, and simple. Although others are great in some respects, their limitations and price tags render them less convenient for mass-banking systems.
For banks looking to trim approval time, diminish mistakes, and upgrade customer satisfaction, implementing a refined PDF merger is no longer a choice - it's necessary.